Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism.
The Dartmouth
November 29, 2024 | Latest Issue
The Dartmouth

Point, Counter-point: The Electronic Breakup

Breakups are hard. There's nothing

worse than someone telling

you that they don't like you so

much anymore, that he'd rather be by

himself than have you to improve his

life by readily making out with him or

by being there for him, at least on speed

dial. Being on the receiving end of a

breakup can feel like being the victim

of a crime; one imagines that it can't

get much worse than this. But it can

if the perpetrator is aided and abetted

by modern technology.

Everyone knows the infamous postit

breakup, brought to the realm of pop

culture references by the creators of

"Sex and the City." Waking up to a small

yellow slip of paper reading "I can't

do this" is pretty low, even for Carrie

Bradshaw. But imagine if the yellow

slip was not on Carrie's desk, but her

desktop. Suddenly that breakup has

plunged from low to virtually subterranean.

It's true, we live in an electronic

age. I sleep with my computer beside

me like it's a Red Rider BB gun. I feel

nervous, uncomfortable and even a

little queasy when I don't have my cell

on me. And though it's true Dartmouth

isn't really a cell phone campus, we

have our own electronic quirks. The

biggest of which is, of course, Blitz.

But just because our lives have become

dominated by electronic means

of staying connected doesn't mean our

relationships should. Profound on the

level of a Carrie Bradshaw pun-riddled

sex column, but the problem is, I'm

not quite sure what that means. So,

I'm going to try a clearer approach.

In the interests of the female half of

campus, that is to say myself, I think

we all need a refresher course in HOW

NOT TO DUMP ME: The Technology

of Break-Up.

The Breakup Blitz

Sure, as I said before, it's an allpurpose

campus tool. We use Blitz for

everything, but ending a relationship

with it still goes under the heading of

"So Not Cool." And it's not only because

it's mean to end anything by typing

"yo, sorry, i cant meet you in foco for

dinner tonite. or tomorrow. i'm really

busy lately." And then "be off Blitz" for

the rest of the term.

It's also technologically dangerous.

The sender may have BCC'd just

about anyone, which is only vaguely

unnerving compared to the number

of people the recipient could forward

to. Suddenly a conversation that could

easily be between only two people can

instantly sprout up all over campus.

This is dangerous for the dumpee, but

mostly for the dumper, who becomes

a douche bag not only by hearsay, but

in cold, hard, Blitzed fact.

The Breakup Text

It's a phenomenon, but actually one

in which we as a nation are lagging. In

a 2005 poll quoted in the Washington

Post, only 2% of Americans admitted

to breaking up with someone by text,

while almost 20% of Britons have along

with 10% of both Italians and Chinese.

Of course, they use the text-message

medium much more overall than us

Americans (as an aside, I wonder

what they do with that extra thumb

strength?), but it also means we have

a chance to preemptively strike at the

proliferation of such weapons of mass

behavioral destruction in our fine nation.

Why bother? First, it's lazy, and

such carelessness is rude. You may

say, "Well, I'm ending it -- who cares

about being rude?" To you, I offer this

argument: it's also really casual. A

breakup done too casually can come

off as not a breakup at all, or at least

not a permanent one. You can't really

make a clean break with such an

abbreviated way communicating. A

good old face-to-face insult is far more

effective, implying forethought and

permanency -- two very good things

when you never want to see someone

again.

Break-up by Phone

Compared to the first two, this is

pretty civilized, but there are still some

issues to consider before breaking up

with someone by calling them. First,

you have to get past the ringing. If

you're calling because you hate conflict

and that's why you're using technology

in the first place, then ringing phones

are hard enough to survive until you

hear a voice on the line. You end up

hanging up about 17 times before you

muster the courage to wait for someone

to pick up.

Then there's the hurdle of actually

saying something. Plus, have you

ever listened to someone cry over the

phone? It's way worse than in person,

the phone magnifies all that snuffling

and honking and squeals catching in

the throat. In person you can pat the

crying moron on the knee or run to

get a box of tissues, but on the phone

what do you do? Yeah, you think about

that for awhile.

So it all boils down to this: breaking

up with someone using technology is

bad for both parties. It's not helping you

or me. Obviously, the modern breakup

is a bad experience for the receiver,

but with the three methods described

above the perpetrator doesn't exactly

enjoy the ride, either. And since the

latter is in control of this situation,

it's best to just choose a method that

doesn't make him (or her!) look like

scum and also conveys the message

clearly. Like post-it notes.

Amy is a staff writer for The Mirror. Her preferred

method to break up is smoke signal.


More from The Dartmouth