Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism. Support independent student journalism.
The Dartmouth
December 1, 2024 | Latest Issue
The Dartmouth

Wal-Mart may open a branch in Lebanon

After years of trying to enter the Upper Valley market, Wal-Mart, the national discount superstore, may soon open a branch in Lebanon despite legal technicalities and reticent townsfolk.

K&J Associates recently applied to develop a tract of land that Wal-Mart previously tried to construct a store on. The Valley News reported that some Lebanon officials speculate that K&J might lease the land to Wal-Mart.

But many local business owners are very against the mega-store coming into the Upper Valley.

"Any large retail corporation, such as Wal-Mart, may be detrimental to local businesses," said Bill Arrand, a Lebanon planning board alternate member. "The downtown businesses are already struggling."

Wal-Mart last year tried to build a shopping center on the tract of land between Route 12A and Interchange Drive, according to the Valley News. Lebanon's planning board rejected Wal-Mart's application to build on the land because it could cause traffic problems, Arrand said.

Wal-Mart appealed the decision, and the case is pending in the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

In 1990, another company, Juster Development Corp., applied for a building permit for the site in question, according to the Valley News. Lebanon's planning board approved Juster's plans for a shopping center.

Juster paved the way for the construction of five buildings totaling nearly 200,000 square feet. K&J currently owns the site, and needs wetlands permits and a building permit to begin construction, according to the Valley News.

Basically, this means that under the Juster plan, K&J could build on the site without getting formal approval from the planning board if it builds according to the original plan.

Wal-Mart could then move in by leasing the land.

But Arrand said if Wal-Mart wants to change the site plan, it would have to go through the planning board process again.

"The configuration is completely different" from Wal-Mart's original proposal, Akins told the Valley News. "I'd say it's a 50-50 chance."