Yang: Underappreciating Our Potential

By Lorelei Yang, Staff Columnist

Published on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

  • Print
  • Report an Error

At a panel session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg made a series of fiery comments on the gender stereotypes that she says prohibit women from advancing in the workplace. Sandberg singled out T-shirts sold in the United States, with the boys’ version bearing the words “Smart Like Daddy” and the girls’ version the words “Pretty Like Mommy” and said, “I would love to say that [those T-shirts were from] 1951, but [they were from] last year. As a woman becomes more successful, she is less liked, and as a man becomes more successful, he is more liked, and that starts with those t-shirts.”

Sandberg also criticized managers whose performance reviews of women reflect stereotypes, such as “she’s great at her job but she’s just not as well liked by her peers,” or “she’s just a bit aggressive,” and suggested that the same observations would not be made of successful men.

Unfortunately, Sandberg’s observations are all too true. For girls, much of the social conditioning that we go through via childrearing practices, literature and, indeed, others’ opinions of ourselves emphasizes likeability and sociability, rather than the assertiveness and outspokenness that are valued in boys as the ideals to which they should hew.

This leads to women being less assertive than men in the workplace, according to Sandberg. Specifically, she said that women “internalize the negative messages [they] get throughout [their] lives...[that] say it’s wrong to be outspoken, aggressive, more powerful than men,” and lower their expectations of what they can achieve, compromising their career goals “to make room for partners and children who may not even exist yet.”

All of this is unfortunately true and, in the case of women who buck these standards, many people make their disapproval all too evident. Marissa Mayer, who was announced as Yahoo’s new chief executive officer last July, can attest to this fact. Mayer, who was six months pregnant when her new job at Yahoo was announced, quickly became the center of an intense national discussion about the responsibility — or lack thereof — of her decision to take a high-pressure, high profile job at a time of personal transition. In an interview, Mayer explained that she only planned to take a few weeks of maternity leave and that she would be available throughout her leave — thus making it clear that, in her mind, her pregnancy would not and should not prevent her from being an effective leader.

In Sandberg’s remarks at Davos, she indicated that the solution to the problem of women constantly underselling and underappreciating their potential is for them to simply be more assertive. However, as Nicholas Kristof wrote in The New York Times, that may not be enough. As Kristof points out, there is a need for structural change — such as better childcare in offices and longer maternity and paternity leaves — to accommodate women and families in corporate environments as well.

Even with that said, however, both Sandberg and Kristof wind up missing what may be perhaps be the biggest point — aside from empowering women and changing institutional structures to accommodate them, the biggest obstacle to female ascent lies in how men view successful women. As long as men view traditional femininity, with its associated subservience, unassertiveness and assumption of secondary roles as an ideal, it will remain difficult to convince women that they can “have it all” as successful and desirable women and to fully embrace trailblazers like Sandberg and Mayer.

While the type of ideological change that this would require is difficult to effect, it is by no means impossible. The incremental success of efforts to move into post-racialism in the workplace proves that opinions and practices can be changed, however slowly that change may occur.

To work toward this change, we as a society — and particularly successful, empowered people like Dartmouth men and women — must make conscious efforts to encourage, rather than discourage, the types of women who will one day be the Sandbergs and Meyers of our generation: hardworking, outspoken and unafraid to speak their minds. In short, it is high time that we start encouraging women to think more like men in the office and to applaud, rather than condemn, them for undertaking actions and embracing mentalities that are perfectly acceptable from men.

Comments

Lets of whining in the D these days: “the biggest obstacle to female ascent lies in how men view successful women.” Gimme a break, or go see Dark Zero Thirty.

In contrast to the authors blame game, Jews were discriminated against for a great many years in America, and when they couldn’t get jobs with big companies or law firms, etc., they just went out and started their own businesses. They quickly proved their competence, and big companies began to hire them.

Why don’t women do the same? Most Jews are as recognizable as women, so don’t say that there is some extra barrier that women have along those lines.

By on Jan 29 | 3:35 am

Great article, you hit on many important ideas. Thanks for writing this!

By on Jan 29 | 12:41 pm

@Big Green ‘90 Good one. The victim mentality is a mistake. Who says women are more disliked when they are successful? Is that what people like, loser women…like the whiner who wrote this column?

By on Jan 29 | 12:44 pm

Nice victim blaming Big Green ‘90. Are you talking about female Jews in your illogical comment? Yeah, didn’t think so. It may be in your best interest to take a class on gender discrimination, because you just made a HUGE sexist statement in your response. Not shocking, but honestly, you really need to catch up on FACTS. I bet lots of Dartmouth men can see the problems with your statement. I think your comment has already been discredited YEARS ago, so, let’s here from the Smart Dartmouth Students now!!!

By on Jan 29 | 1:32 pm

Nice agreement that the writer is a victim WOW. Women are now victims of success? If women are less liked as successes by some people, tough. Men are less liked by some people because of their success too. The premise of the column is false and makes the next point in the feminist play book. First, women couldn’t get the good jobs. Then they couldn’t move up the ladder in good jobs. Then they hit the glass ceiling for good jobs. Then they got the top good jobs but they are now not loved enough when they get there. Victim, victim, victim every step of the way. Whine, whine, whine. If you want to be loved, better get a dog. “So let’s here [sic] from the Smart Dartmouth students now!!!” It’s a clear bet that “WOW” isn’t one of them!!!

By on Jan 29 | 3:24 pm

WOW is a classic enabler of victims. Rather than helping someone find the courage to fight the good fight, his weak sympathy simply allows them to go on feeling sorry for themselves.

By on Jan 29 | 4:26 pm

fantastic article

By on Jan 29 | 5:42 pm

Comments are closed on this article.

Most Viewed | Latest Comments

  1. Students, alumni file Clery Act complaint
  2. Ramesh: A Modest Proposal
  3. Schneider: Investing With Foresight
  4. A Modest Bro-posal
  5. DHMC program faces 4 lawsuits
  6. Busta rhymes to an enthusiastic crowd in Leede Arena
  7. AS SEEN ON: NBC reveals new pilots, returning programs
  8. College sees growth in total revenue in fiscal year 2012
  9. Campus Icons: Where Have They Gone?
  10. Daily Debriefing