Wang: Getting Your Money’s Worth

By Ethan Wang, Staff columnist and former Opinion editor

Published on Thursday, October 11, 2012

  • Print
  • Report an Error

Correction appended

There is a scene in “Good Will Hunting” (1997) in which Matt Damon’s character Will, an uneducated janitor, has an argument with a hotshot college student about some deep academic subject. After outsmarting the college student, Will memorably tells him, “You dropped 150 grand on a f*ckin’ education you could’ve got for $1.50 in late charges at the public library.”

This world may not have many geniuses like Will Hunting, but you don’t need to look far to find hotshot college students who are spending hefty amounts on an education they arguably could have received for free. The sticker price of a term’s worth of education at Dartmouth is about $15,000. But many of the bright minds here could probably learn just as much if they skipped all their classes and simply read the textbook or online lectures on YouTube. Every term, more than a few have succeeded in doing just that. In her column this week, Yoo Jung Kim questioned the value of a college degree and argued that we should consider other, more practical paths to certain careers (“To What Degree,” Oct. 9). It’s not hard to see where Kim is coming from. With most college classes consisting of lectures that cover material easily found books, a motivated person may very well learn just a much by spending four years at the public library. Yet our society is unlikely to discount the importance of a college degree any time soon, so no alternative to college will ever carry the same value. Rather, we need to work on making a college degree truly as worthwhile as it’s considered to be.

A college education needs to provide something that the learning we get from spending time in the library and on the Internet do not. Of course, college offers many opportunities for growth and education outside the classroom, but those extracurricular experiences alone cannot justify the astronomical cost of tuition and the value that employers place on a college degree. And yes, college also offers a sprinkling of seminar classes in which discussions sometimes generate new insights and perspectives that cannot be gleaned from reading books alone. But putting a bunch of bright students together to talk about material found in that day’s reading shouldn’t be worth $15,000 a term.

What ultimately distinguishes a college education from the one a library can provide is the faculty of this country’s leading — and most expensive — institutions of higher learning. However, even at a place like Dartmouth that avoids teaching assistants, professors are highly underutilized. Currently, the closest interaction that many Dartmouth students have with their professors is through the occasional office hour meeting and a couple of 15-person seminars they take their freshman and senior years. We can do much better.

Many British universities, most prominently Oxford and Cambridge Universities, use the tutorial method, in which classes consist of one-on-one meetings with the instructor. These tutorials are focused on problem solving, deep discussion and individualized teaching rather than regurgitation of standard textbook material. Granted, these British schools rely heavily on teaching assistants to allow every class to have individualized one-on-one teaching. However, small private schools like Dartmouth can easily apply a less extreme model, in which tutorials have slightly more students and are used to complement traditional classes. With Dartmouth’s eight-to-one student-to-faculty ratio, it is feasible for students to make one of their three courses each term a small, tutorial-like class.

We can free up professors by delegating some of the traditional lecture courses, especially introductory classes, to graduate teaching assistants. It may feel good to have that 100-person introductory economics or biology class taught by “real” professors, but how much does a leading academic contribute to a class in which most of the material comes right out of the textbook and in which office hours are dominated by students asking to reiterate information from lectures? Students will likely get just as much out of the class if teaching assistants take over. In return, professors are free to focus their teaching on small tutorial classes — a format that is no doubt more interesting for the teacher and more rewarding for the student.

The original version of this article misidentified the names of two British universities. They are the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, not Oxford and Cambridge Universities.

Comments

I’ll stick with the professors, thanks.

By on Oct 11 | 9:59 am

I’ve forgotten most of what was stuffed into my head in 17 years of college. But I know where to go to find it.

The point of learning is not to accumulate stuff from class in your head, but to raise the ship a little bit in the Panama Canal of your mind, until you emerge suddenly in the Pacific, 1000 feet higher.

Paul D. Keane

M.A., M.Div., M.Ed.

By on Oct 11 | 12:46 pm

Now why would you “Stick with the professors, thanks.” You graduated. Also, there is more education in the book, “The Constitution of Liberty” by Friedrich Hayek, than you will get in any four years in any college or university in the world. Read it and save your money and your parents money. This is an excellent column.

By on Oct 11 | 2:25 pm

“Currently, the closest interaction that many Dartmouth students have with their professors is through the occasional office hour meeting and a couple of 15-person seminars they take their freshman and senior years.”

I think is an overstatement; it might be true for really big majors like bio or psych, but not so much for smaller majors. All of my professors in my small major, for example, know me and my work. I’ve spent time outside of the classroom with these profs (not just office hours) and most of the classes I took with them had 25 students or less. Even outside my small major, I’ve had a lot of interaction with profs, like in language classes.

By on Oct 11 | 3:45 pm

@ Paul D. Keane, M.A., M.Div., M. Ed., Nothing in the head but you know where to find it. If there’s nothing in there, what do you think about? “raise the ship a little bit in the Panama Canal of your mind, until you emerge suddenly in the Pacific, 1000 feet higher.” Let’s just take a quick look at the metaphor. The metaphor promotes the preposterous concept that one suddenly finds themselves in the Pacific, 1000 feet higher. If you had an understanding that sea level is roughly the same everywhere on earth, transiting from the Atlantic to the Pacific would put you exactly at the level that you started. Between the oceans (in the Panama Canal), the ships are lifted up through locks to Gatun Lake, 85 feet above sea level and then dropped back down 85 feet to sea level on the other side. 1) You don’t end up one foot higher than you started out in the Panama Canal (in your mind you do) and if you did, there would have to be a natural disaster of catastrophic proportions. 2) The idea that your mind is the Panama Canal raising you 1000 feet assumes that your mind is filling up with something, that both vanishes and accumulates at the same time, according to you…It is sadly apparent that you really “have forgotten most of what was stuffed in there.”

By on Oct 11 | 5:42 pm

Comments are closed on this article.

Most Viewed | Latest Comments

  1. Freshman charged with rape
  2. Fourth arrested after drug incident at SAE
  3. Students criticize PB’s choice of ASAP Rocky
  4. Two women win Big Green contest
  5. ORL denies mold problems in River halls
  6. Concerts, student performances planned for Green Key
  7. Major Lazer, ASAP Rocky to perform over Green Key Weekend
  8. Police arrest 17 over Green Key weekend
  9. Spalding '76 named dean of Iowa State's College of Business
  10. Shaggy to replace Major Lazer