Lack of proof hinders hazing investigations

By Leslie Ye, The Dartmouth Staff

Published on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

  • Print
  • Report an Error

Hazing allegations are rarely brought against Dartmouth Greek organizations, sports teams and other student groups due to the difficulty of finding witnesses to corroborate such accusations, according to Hanover Chief of Police Nicholas Giaccone. Recent hazing allegations by Andrew Lohse ’12 have brought increased visibility to the issue of hazing at Dartmouth and how both the College and the Hanover Police Department respond to these allegations.

There are many “entry points” that can initiate an investigation into claims of alleged hazing, according to Director of Judicial Affairs Nathan Miller. Students can report hazing that they have personally experienced, or Safety and Security officers responding to an incident call can report potential hazing violations. Concerned parents, faculty members, staff and anonymous tipsters have also sent emails reporting incidents in the past, according to Miller.

Once such a claim is made, Miller, along with Associate Dean of the College for Campus Life April Thompson and Director of Safety and Security and College Proctor Harry Kinne, initiates discussions to determine how to proceed, Miller said. If the hazing claims are made against a Greek house, the talks will also involve Greek Letter Organization and Societies Director Wes Schaub. In addition, the College is required by law to report such claims to Hanover Police, Schaub said.

The College receives anywhere from zero to four complaints regarding hazing each year, Miller said, though he stressed that these numbers do not remain consistent from year to year. The cases usually involve a Greek organization, an athletic team or a student group endorsed by the Council on Student Organizations, according to Miller.

Giaccone said, however, that complaints exclusively regarding hazing in Greek organizations occur one or two times per term. Of those complaints, usually no more than one case has enough evidence to be prosecuted, he said.

On Jan. 25, The Dartmouth published an opinion column by Lohse, in which Lohse accused his former fraternity, Sigma Alpha Epsilon, of hazing violations. Lohse brought his complaints to Thompson and Chief of Staff David Spalding, who he alleges did not adequately respond to his claims. Spalding and Thompson said they were unable to investigate Lohse’s claims as thoroughly as they would have liked because of his unwillingness to file a complaint on the record and his insistence on anonymity.

Anonymity, however, does not prevent the College from investigating any accusations of hazing, but it can restrict whether the College is able to formally adjudicate a case, according to Miller.

“It does not mean that we aren’t going to ask questions or look into something,” Miller said. “Even if we receive an anonymous report, we’re always going to call in that group or individuals if there’s an allegation.”

When a student who is not willing to testify on the record accuses a fraternity of hazing practices, Hanover Police and the College must find evidence to support his or her claims, Giaccone said.

“In the particular case of SAE, you have a named person who wishes to remain anonymous,” Giaccone said. “If you’re not going to use that person to directly testify, you try to seek out other individuals who observed what happened to that person.”

While the level of hazing may differ from case to case and can ultimately affect the severity of penalties, the varying severity of accusations does not change the College’s approach to investigations, Schaub said.

“We address all allegations of hazing in the same manner,” Schaub said. “I can’t speak for the criminal court processes, but we investigate and approach [allegations] in the same way regardless of what could be perceived as a variance in severity.”

Once an investigation is initiated, the College and Hanover Police conduct separate investigations and keep separate files on the allegations, although information is shared between the two parties, according to Schaub. Typically, the College will assist Hanover Police in its investigation, Giaccone said. If it is determined that criminal charges can be brought against an organization, Hanover Police may subpoena Safety and Security’s file, according to Giaccone.

There is no specific protocol for how such claims are investigated, according to Giaccone.

“You go where the evidence takes you,” he said. “There is no set formula since each case has its own set of circumstances.”

The College defines hazing as “any action taken or situation created involving prospective or new members of a group or as a condition of continued membership in a group (fraternity, sorority, team, club or other organization), which would be perceived by a reasonable person as likely to produce mental or physical discomfort, harm, stress, embarrassment, harassment or ridicule,” according to the College’s Student Handbook.

New Hampshire state law, however, only covers situations in which psychological or physical harm could be inflicted on a student. Consequently, the College’s threshold is “far lower than New Hampshire state law,” Giaccone said.

As such, it is often difficult to build a case against an accused organization, even if pledging activities are witnessed, according to Giaccone.

In the fall, the College adjudicated two allegations of hazing by fraternities. Although the College has not formally released the names of those organizations, Giaccone confirmed that Hanover Police were involved in one of the investigations, which involved Theta Delta Chi fraternity.

An anonymous female called the Hanover Police on Oct. 10 at 8:30 p.m. to report that there was shouting and a possible physical altercation occurring at the stone church “behind West Wheelock Street,” according to the police report.

When police officers arrived on the scene, they found Theta Delt members and pledges participating in what the house refers to as “Hopes, Fears and Dreams,” Giaccone said. A group of pledges had been blindfolded and were being led individually to the steps of Theta Delt’s physical plant, where “fraternity members would beat the ground and stairs with sticks while another house member screamed like he was being hit,” Giaccone said.

In this case, no charges were filed against Theta Delt because Hanover Police felt the psychological effects of the initiation practices fell into a “gray area,” Giaccone said. The investigation is now closed.

For situations in which no actual hazing is witnessed — such as Lohse’s accusations against SAE — the only way to attempt to build a case is through interviews, according to Giaccone.

“We get assistance from the College in who the members of a fraternity are, who the pledges are,” he said.

In trying to find additional witnesses, Giaccone said investigators have run into problems in the past because students are unwilling to come forward.

“You have people who don’t want to be socially ostracized, no matter what the level you’re looking at — whether it’s a fraternity, sorority, sports team or any other extracurricular where there’s a group membership,” he said. “Unless somebody was really seriously injured, there would more than likely not be corroborating witnesses.”

Giaccone said he believes the definition of hazing varies from person to person.

“I think there is a certain level of hazing that goes on, but it’s all just different forms of variations of what hazing is,” he said. “Hazing to one person may not be hazing to another.”

While Hanover Police’s role in investigating claims regarding hazing is purely procedural, Miller and Schaub said they are both involved in efforts to combat hazing at College.

“We are always trying to educate people on better methods of bringing in new members,” Schaub said.

The College focuses on opening lines of communication between students and the administration regarding hazing practices, according to Miller.

“Education is a key component of getting people knowledgeable of how to report it if they feel uncomfortable,” Miller said. “It’s very similar to reporting sexual assault — there is hesitation to bring that forward sometimes, and we’re focused on letting people know it’s okay to come to us if you feel uncomfortable with something.”

On Feb. 1, the film “Finding Kind,” a documentary about the effects of “girl-on-girl bullying,” is being shown in Collis Common Ground, followed by a discussion led by Dartmouth professor and New Hampshire District Court Judge Jennifer Sargent. The event is being sponsored by the Panhellenic Council, GLOS and the College’s eight Panhellenic sororities and is part of the Greek system’s ongoing efforts to educate students about hazing, Miller said.

The College’s fraternities are also in the process of finding a speaker to come to the College and discuss hazing, according to Miller.

Comments

Are you kidding me, Giaccone? If something falls in the gray area of hazing you simply ignore it because you don’t want to bring it to court? Yet if a student has one drop of alcohol in his system you willingly arrest him and zealously prosecute him. The TDX incident was clearly hazing and everyone involved in it should be in prison right now.

Andrew Lohse brought photographs of actual SAE hazing to David Spalding and April Thompson, yet they ignored his evidence because he wasn’t willing to go on the record? Imagine if someone got murdered but because the victim/witness was dead and unable to testify, the murderer got off even though there was physical evidence and photographs of the crime taking place. Why could the members of SAE not be subpoenaed to appear in court and tell the truth about hazing under oath? Giaccone looks for the easy way out every time when it comes to actual crimes.

And finally, when complaints are made about hazing, why does S&S not send out a campus-wide message notifying all students that there is a potential threat? We get these when attempted assaults occur and when there is an iPhone bandit on the loose, but when it comes to hazing the administration sweeps the accusations under the rug and refuses to notify the greater community so we can know to stay away from these degrading organizations. S&S has shown time and again their incompetence when it comes to protecting the student body. The iPhone bandit has struck 3 times with no action, they haven’t done anything about the Fahey-McLane vandals and they did nothing to stop this dangerous hazing at TDX or SAE. Wow do I feel safe on this campus…

By on Jan 31 | 2:24 am

So in all of the comments and discussions on hazing, I’m not seeing a whole lot of talk about this one thing: alcohol. No, not that pledges are being made to drink until they boot, but that the most serious of abuses are likely happening while pledges are drunk or blacked out. So the D talks about a lack of proof, comments say “get up and walk away” and others talk about social psychology…look, it all matters, but it’s interesting that nobody’s making the connection between the fact that when frat leadership gets everyone really drunk (or everyone gets drunk on their own accord), they can do whatever they want to them. Which, when you think about it, is a really interesting lesson for the men of Dartmouth to learn. “Lack of proof hinders sexual assault investigations.” Oh…yea…that.

By on Jan 31 | 9:59 am

@it has to be said your comments are pure lunacy. Your statement that “everyone involved in (the TDX incident) should be in prison right now,” is absurd on multiple levels. You can’t throw people in prison for yelling in public or hitting sticks against the ground. Sorry. Grow up and realize we’re not in fantasyland- in America, you need evidence that satisfies the burden of proof in order to bring charges in a court of law. And it’s not easy to catch criminals—the police forces surely did what they could to apprehend the Fahey-Mclane vandals, but unwitnessed vandalism is a nearly impossible crime to stop and track down.

By on Jan 31 | 11:02 am

Zack already pretty much covered what I was going to respond but I have to point out another strange point you made. This is NOT like a murder case. Lohse is not dead, so the comparison to a murder victim is weird. Witnesses do need to testify. so. Also, common sense should tell you that beating a stick on the ground will not (and should not) get you jail time. Good god.

By on Jan 31 | 2:30 pm

It does not sound like the person that reported this is making it up. I find it appalling to hear of such things going on at what is supposed to be an elite school to be conducting itself in this manner. Would think twice about exposing my child to this type of horrendous behaviour! It certainly lessens my view of the school.

By on Jan 31 | 2:33 pm

“This is NOT like a murder case. Lohse is not dead,”

No, you’re absolutely right. Lohse is not dead. On the other hand, at SAE’s Cornell chapter, now disbanded, one member, George Desdunes, is.

http://cornellsun.com/section/news/content/2011/05/06/four-charged-connection-george-desdunes-13-death

When Cornell SAE was disbanded as a result, 16 former Cornell SAE pledges joined Tau Kappa Epsilon. Cornell TKE has now had its recognition revoked for three years following reports of an alcohol-related hospitalization of a freshman.

There is something seriously wrong with SAE — everywhere, apparently, and more than with other frats, whatever their problems.

http://cornellsun.com/section/news/content/2012/01/19/tke-will-lose-recognition-after-reported-hospitalization

In any case, the allegations made by Lohse, if true, are absolutely appalling.

By on Jan 31 | 4:00 pm

Comments are closed on this article.

Most Viewed | Latest Comments

  1. Consider the Plight of Keggy
  2. $540 A Pop
  3. Hanover 'Street Fest' to transform town
  4. Online courses create new learning methods
  5. Admissions sees natural shifts
  6. A new College president, a controversial Initiative and tragic loss mark Class of 2002's Dartmouth careers
  7. 'Keggy' makes an awaited return
  8. Chabad, Hillel help build College's Jewish community
  9. North Hall to become green living center
  10. Drowning victim identified