Opponents of governance changes have no reason to sue

By Patrick Mattimore, San Francisco

Published on Wednesday, September 26, 2007

  • Print
  • Report an Error

To the Editor:

Having made the best of efforts to separate the rhetorical wheat from the chaff with regard to the "governance thing," I admit to feeling left with a bowl of farina. In isolation, both sides' arguments sound sound, and so, it becomes difficult from a distance, to understand how the synthesis could be so disharmonious.

As an attorney, I can't even begin to understand the thinking that might lead a group of alumni to now initiate procedures to sue the College. Surely, either in Hanover or recruited from elsewhere, there must be a few cooler heads who would be willing to sit with interested parties and hammer out reasonable accommodations.

Both sides should understand that what may have started as fascinating diversion played out in the national press (most notably the pages of the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times) threatens to irreparably harm the College and her reputation. None of the participants should believe that prolonging these squabbles can possibly produce beneficent results.

I am no mediator but would certainly be willing along, no doubt, with many other stakeholders, to help broker a solution.

Comments

Comments are closed on this article.

Most Viewed | Latest Comments

  1. Lohse: Telling the Truth
  2. Pollard: Muckraking for a Buck
  3. Rolling Stone article targets College culture
  4. Obama nominates College President Jim Yong Kim to lead the World Bank
  5. Rolling Stone publishes article about hazing at Dartmouth
  6. Chang: Inequity in Our Backyard
  7. Tuck initiative broadens use of online resources
  8. UJAO drops all 27 SAE hazing charges
  9. Mahoney: How Not to Combat Hazing
  10. Romney allegedly eyeing Ayotte