A Hasty Conclusion?

By Peter Allen, Library Special Collections

Published on Wednesday, November 6, 2002

  • Print
  • Report an Error

To the Editor:

I am writing to you in response to the swastika incident in the Rockefeller Center. While it is clear that the swastika symbol has been used in the past to represent evil, to label it automatically as an "anti-Semitic sign" is inaccurate. The swastika is an ancient symbol that has been used by different cultures and races, worldwide, for thousands of years. The vast majority of these peoples and the ideas that the swastika meant to them were anything but anti-Semitic. It can be found in Hindu mythology, Hopi Indian art and ancient, pre-Christian, northern European heathenism.

While it is possible that the perpetrator is a follower of National Socialism and perhaps is anti-Semitic, to just assume such things is, in my humble eyes, inappropriate and irresponsible.

As a person of northern European descent and a practicing heathen, I found your automatic assumption of anti-Semitism insulting. Next time you shouldn't jump to conclusions quite so quickly.

Comments

Comments are closed on this article.

Most Viewed | Latest Comments

  1. Lohse: Telling the Truth
  2. Pollard: Muckraking for a Buck
  3. Rolling Stone article targets College culture
  4. Obama nominates College President Jim Yong Kim to lead the World Bank
  5. Rolling Stone publishes article about hazing at Dartmouth
  6. Chang: Inequity in Our Backyard
  7. Tuck initiative broadens use of online resources
  8. UJAO drops all 27 SAE hazing charges
  9. Mahoney: How Not to Combat Hazing
  10. Romney allegedly eyeing Ayotte